Category: Free Entertainment Essays Samples

Many people saw the Holocaust as a terrifying, horrific, and horrifying event. It is hard to believe that six millions of Jews were murdered by the Nazis. There are many ways they were tortured and killed. It is impossible to understand the pain of every individual. Only Holocaust victims could experience the horror of the Holocaust. Steven Spielberg’s film Schindler’s List had one goal: to make the viewers feel connected to the characters. The film helped them begin to understand the horror of the Holocaust on a more intimate scale.

Spielberg has a lot of horrible imagery, which makes it feel like I’m forming a bond with them. This is the connection Spielberg had to achieve in Schindler’s List. I feel the character’s pain. This makes it possible for me to see the horror and feel the pain of every person who has been left behind. The film allowed me to see how the Nazis treated Jews in concentration camps by writing numbers on their arms or starving them to death. Oskar Scheindler understands that his Jewish laborers are being murdered and cannot stand by. He puts them to work in his factory to try to save them all. They are given the chance to escape being shot, but some end up being removed from his factory and killed. I am the watcher and understand these individuals.

AmonGoeth’s portrayal of a Nazi hostile Semitist officer gives a shocking look into his mind. He shoots Jews with his rifle, and I think it’s fun. He views Jewish people as a whole. He does love Helen Hirsch. Goeth doesn’t deny any affiliation to an individual, like Schindler. His dehumanization of and murder of Jews untold times helps me to recall Russia in our readings.

To the film’s incredible last scene, Spielberg portrays independence as an option. This film was beautiful and moving, but also very extraordinary. In one scene, an old man goes to Schindler’s office. He expresses his gratitude for saving him. Because he had only one arm, he was ultimately killed. It was also heartbreaking to see the train take so many honest people to the gas chambers. Schindler’s List is a must-see. It greatly enriched my understanding of Nazi History. The death camps were to be used as detention communities for people who were considered to be incendiary by Nazi heads. After watching the film, it became clear that Jewish people would retain their assets regardless of what it meant.

A part of me still believes that Schindler will pivot in the midst the ghetto being liquidated. A little girl in a red coat is noticed by him. It’s the main shading case used throughout the film. It was eye-opening to see and so hard to understand how they divided families.

It’s impossible to say anything with certainty. Postmodernism claims that there’s no absolute truth. People see the truth as they believe it to be and then identify it. The film Stranger Than Fiction is part the recent postmodern movie cycle. It explores important questions in our daily lives and has a philosophical significance. The movie’s postmodern elements are well-shown and help the viewer understand the message. These elements can be seen as distracting from the main message. However, the movie uses fragmentation and asks questions without answering the answers to show that the conventions of the genre can be powerful tools.

Harold Crack, the film’s main character, is a man who keeps track of his steps, counts his brushstrokes and tracks his progress to the bus stop. He also records his work breaks using his wristwatch. The man seems to be merely following the watch’s commands and acting as its servant. Harold lets the watch dictate his personality, which is the main problem. To find meaning and comfort, the character has to live a 12-year-old daily routine. Physical fragmentation is used to draw attention to the routine. This includes obscure camera angles, rotating shots, rotations of shots, and graphics. These techniques provide a deeper understanding about Harold’s personality and make for an interesting film. The fragmentation quickly moves on to another postmodernism component, which is asking questions and not answering them. This postmodern component makes audiences think about what human life means. The movie’s fundamental questions revolve around the following: Is Harold’s story real? Are Harold and Taxes real characters or are they fictional? Karen Eiffel wrote and assumed all events. The viewer still has many options to ask philosophical questions. Unfortunately, the answer is not provided. The wristwatch became a personification of time, which led to everyone asking the question, Is time controlling me? This question teaches us to be more efficient with our time and not get lost in the routine like the main character of the movie. It is also important to not ask questions but give answers. Films have a well-defined genre. Stranger than fiction is not able to give an exact genre, so people have to choose what one suits them best. The film does not portray the characters’ lives as funny or sad, but asks its audience to consider whether their lives are a comedy of tragedy. Everyone expects to see the tragic ending, considering that everyone knows the protagonist must die. Harold discovers his true love unexpectedly and is able to transform his life with the hope of avoiding death. Anna Pascal is the girl who refuses taxes and whose goal is to make her passions a reality, allowing her to do what she likes. Harold is aware of his imminent death and learns how important it is to have a purpose in life and achieve goals throughout your lifetime. The man sets out to fulfill a dream: to play the electric guitar.

Harold learns to play a guitar song, and it is what makes him a success. It also proves to be the reason Anna fell for him. The movie seems to be the pivotal moment and second chance for the protagonist. However, further events alter the story. Harold talks to his life creator and asks her for help. After reading the book, Harold understands that fate is unchangeable. So, instead of saving the boy, the man courageously throws himself in front the bus. Karen Eiffel, the main character of the novel, realizes she was about as close to killing an actual person as she is and changes the ending. Harold is rescued by his wristwatch after he was injured and appears in hospital. The movie, Stranger Than Fiction, has well-executed postmodern elements and is certainly a success. These elements can teach students important philosophical lessons that will help them live a meaningful life. It is important that you realize that fate can’t be changed, but there are always options to alter how people react to it.

Today’s music is mostly profane, such as pop and rap. African music is the one thing that hasn’t changed. African music still has great popularity today, despite being true to its roots. This essay will discuss how America’s modern-day music has had an impact on African culture.

African music, also known as African American musical today, is better known than African music. The transatlantic slave ship brought many kinds of African music to America. Afrobeat, which was founded in 1960 by Felakuti, was responsible for introducing a polyrhythmic sound. There were many ethnic groups representing different African cultures that travelled to America in the early days of Africans arriving. Some Africans brought their own instruments, while others bought a new instrument. A good example of this is “Banja”, which is now known as the banjo. It was one the first African instruments to be imported to America. “In 1830s, the Great Awakening triggered a rise of Christian fundamentalism, particularly among African Americans.” This was the beginning of mainstream African American musical genres. These were the first times that African Americans began to sing Christian and spiritual songs. Many of these songs were code to allow them to escape slavery. The colonies were banning many African Americans’ musics by 1800. Their voice was, however, the most important instrument they had access to. This was something that colonizers failed to realize. Michael Fitch states that African Americans use the banjo, guitar, and violin as their main instruments. Mouth Bow is an additional instrument that they use, as it was most commonly used during their time as slaves. Diddley bow is a single-string instrument. It also influenced the blues sound. They are not the same as African American music, or Sub-Saharan African instruments. “Membranophone” is the traditional African instrument. It vibrates a stretched membrane to produce sound. Gankogui, an African bell made from forged iron, is a percussion instrument. The two sounds it makes are gang or gong when it’s pressed against a wooden stick. African music and African American musical styles have many similarities. They are both known for their percussion drums. What is it that makes African music unique? “Uniqueness in African music comes from the simplicity of its melodies, which are repetitive and are not long. However, this makes the beat very exciting. It is simple for Africans today to claim the authenticity and variety of western music genres. This is because they know that many of their ancestors were slaves in the transatlantic slave trade. Many musical characteristics are common in Africa. A polyrhythm, which is a combination of more than one rhythm at once, is an example. Africans are also famous for their musical dancing. They use both African music and combines them in their ritual ceremonies. These musical characteristics are African origins. They can claim authenticity. Music is a tradition that everyone does. Even though certain people are better than others at singing and clapping, everyone is encouraged. Musical performances include dancing and singing in Africa. These performances are part of Africa’s tradition. In Mali, for example, thousands of people attend a three-day musical festival.

So, African music is often found in situations where the primary goal of people is not to be artistic. Music is more for ceremonies (lifecycle rituals, festivals), subsistence, childcare and domestic chores, as well as play (games or parties). Music makes an event more successful by helping to focus attention, communicate information, encourage social solidarity, and transform consciousness. This shows how music is embedded in African society. It is used in a way that is connected to the daily life of Africans, and not just as a background music like Western societies.

Talk shows are television programs or programming genres that feature one person or several people. In these cases, they discuss topics related to politics, media, and any other respectable profession. Talk shows are paid by individuals. Talk shows are a form of broadcasting in the 20th century, similar to the musical drama. It takes an extremely ancient form of communication, conversation, and turns it into a minimally laborious but still very prominent type of data. The talk show was not created overnight. It was born out of 40 long periods of television practice. The two main traditions that shaped television talk shows were entertainment and news. Over time, hybrid forms emerged that combined news, public relations, and diverting. These mixed forms are a middle ground in entertainment and news. However, their hosts (Phil Donahue or Oprah Winfrey for example) have their preparation in journalism. These programs are meant to be unpredictable and unscripted. Viewers from around the globe will watch them and see the final result. They will also get to hear what the guests have to say. This will keep viewers coming back week after week. These talk shows, which are reality-based and discuss the most current topic, often see guests fight with one another and use abusive language against one another without realizing that they are broadcast live across the country and around the globe. Because of this, abusive language and slang can have a negative impact upon society, nations, and the global community. This implies that we learn our language from our family members, but as we get more familiar with the world, our vocabulary and decisions about which language to use change. Language is like the moon in the oceans. – Rita Mae Brown Language has hidden power, like the moon on the tides.

It is said that raising a child is a collective effort. The media can make a big contribution to raising our children and teens. Speakers who aren’t careful with word choice can make it difficult for the audience to believe that they are speaking the truth. It is essential to understand the meanings of words in order to help you speak clearly and with distinction. It is possible to lose credibility with your audience and viewers if you don’t take care in this area.

Talk shows and current affairs programs are full of language standards that are not maintained and untrue and misleading words are used, which is a lot for our youth to be exposed to. They have failed to learn the art of complex and conceptual thinking. They are failing to learn the art of conceptual and complex ideas. Talk shows that involve the entire population and have basic onlookers seem to offer a different kind of television entertainment. They are characterized with simple biographies of people who can help improve the situation. It makes you rely on your TV and makes you want to be extraordinary. This is a very sensible thought in these times. To be precise, reality shows increase the commitment of the viewers. This is why there are more TV stations that offer a safe environment for moral methodologies.

We can also see that the TV creators get aided by advertising people, which makes it seem like there is a traitorous relationship between the viewer and the TV. Here, manipulation is a factor. The TV program must be very advanced in order to attract a significant audience. This issue is raised because of the many dialogues that relate to how the general public views its morality through television. Tony Krijnen indicated that, even though there are plenty of voices calling for television to be important in building an ethical society, television can still affect the deep quality of its people.

What is the TV screen’s creative potential? This is what we mean when we look at it from a point of reasoning. The more people who are watching the TV the better their creativity works with the TV experts. As we stare at the TV, our digestive system is in an ongoing process. This involves the translation and the association. The story path with sound/picture is the best method of control. Entertainment, in general, is a pleasant movement of the brain. What does entertainment mean to us in these modern times?

One thing is certain among all the many types of engagement, and it’s television. It’s a very special medium for the brain and eye. Television is an instrument of preoccupation that provides us with a means for viewing the world. The verb engage is an action that holds one’s attention. This is a fascinating point that both entertainers and creators have to consider. This discussion covers the control of entertainment for children, celebrity language, how to create it, as well as the redirection of copyrights. However, the focus is on human nobility and media portrayal. Mass communication manages the moral and ethical aspects broadcasting.

Television is the best medium to learn about ethical care. Entertainment and data can be considered a small part of the ideal television program. It is a picture of reality. We deliver television, language, and data. We are both the creators and the customers. There is space for discussing moral reasonability. This allows us to see the world in a way that does not communicate fear. Television’s social feedback can be used to make the world, or the global television, more human. Because television was before media tools and has the ability to control it in a decent spot, this can help to reduce the anxiety about television. We can also reevaluate entertainment and see that there is another way to view life. This involves creating bliss, allowing us to forget our daily lives and making it more valuable. We can see how talk shows depict a kind of ethics. This explains why TV chooses to show truth, integrity, peacefulness and flexibility in making decisions. Thoughts and words have power. Pictures and words have results. This material is applicable to different aspects of television’s ability to make us happy, or control us during an entertainment show or talk show.

Mel Gibson directed Braveheart in 1995 and has been a highly-regarded movie in Hollywood. It was nominated for, and won multiple Academy Awards. Braveheart, due to the high level of praise it received upon its release may be surprising to some. History and analysis consider Braveheart one of most historically inaccurate films of our time. The story centers on William Wallace, a knight and rebel from Scotland who led many rebellions against English monarchy at the start of the 14th Century. Although the story is set in a historical setting, it does not necessarily reflect accuracy. However, many events are exaggerated to make the story more accessible and easier to understand. Braveheart appears to be a historian who uses historical context and content as inspiration. The film values the entertainment element of history more than the accuracy of its retelling.

His early life is not documented, but historians do have some information that suggests Wallace was born 1270 in Paisley. According to historians, Wallace was the only child of a Scottish minor nobleman. William Wallace likely learned to fight in medieval knight’s style because he was a “man-of-arms” as a child. The historical record of William Wallace as portrayed in this film is however contradictory. The film depicts Wallace as the son and farmer of a farmer. He spent the majority of his youth behind a tractor. Now it is clear that this portrayal of Wallace’s early years is inaccurate. It is now known that this film portrays Wallace’s early life in a very inaccurate way. Murron battles the English soldiers to obtain Prima Nocte. This legal right was supposed to have allowed medieval European lords to “deflower subordinate women”. Murron is arrested and executed publicly for refusing to obey. Wallace’s clan leads the massacre of English troops stationed within his hometown in retaliation for Murron’s killing. This is believed to have been the beginning of a rebellion against English rule across the country. This depiction can be used to draw attention to historical errors. First, it is not documented that William Wallace ever got married. Another historical error is that Prima Nocta was not enacted across Scotland after Edward I’s ascension. Many historians believe Prima Nocta has been misunderstood in medieval Europe. They also believe that it was a false claim made to make foreign rulers seem less barbaric. It is unlikely that Wallace’s wife existed, but the notion that Wallace was motivated by her murder would be absurd. More likely, Wallace was either determined to overthrow the English or resentful of their occupation of his country. The filmmakers also assume that Wallace’s first fight against British soldiers who executed Murron led to a wider rebellion against English rule throughout Scotland. Many Scots were protesting British rule before Wallace was involved in any kind of rebellion. The Battle of Falkirk is the main battle that the film centers on. These are both historic events. The Battle of Stirling Bridge took place first. In real life it took place on September 11th 1297. However, the film claims that it took place seventeen years prior. Andrew de Moray was the leader of the battle. He was not mentioned by Walt Wallace. At the bridge over Forth River, Wallace and his men were confronted by an English army. Wallace’s forces had a huge advantage, but the English were forced across a narrow bridge by their superior numbers. Peter Armstrong describes the bridge as follows in his text Stirling Bridge & Falkirk – William Wallace’s Rebellion. They used clever tactics to pack men onto the bridge, which helped them overcome their numerical disadvantage. They waited until almost a third the English troops had arrived on the bridge before they launched an attack. This caught them off-guard and resulted in an unlikely victory. Braveheart’s battle took place on a flat, wide plain. Although the battle scene was filmed around a bridge, the filmmakers took many liberties. However, they kept the idea that the Scottish were outnumbered but still emerged victorious. Many aspects of The Battle of Falkirk are inaccurate portrayals of past events. According to historical records, it took place July 22, 1298. Wallace loses the battle to betray some of his closest friends in the movie. It was actually lost due to a technological disadvantage. The English just invented longbows to equip their infantrymen with, which can outshoot even the best Scottish archers. The battle resulted in approximately 10,000 deaths of Scottish soldiers. This failure proved to be a setback for Wallace’s reputation. He was forced to resign from the position of Guardian of Scotland, and the rebellion began to decline. The movie’s most historical error is between the Battle of Falkirk (and the execution of William Wallace). In the movie, Edward I is shown as suffering from the attacks of Wallace against Britain. These attacks were presented in the film in a positive light, although it is probable that they were not significant in the context of the war. They had no significant impact on the English presence at Scotland. Edward I didn’t likely view Wallace as a threat. Wallace was still trying to build an army after the defeat at Falkirk. In an effort to support the Scottish Rebellion’s failing rebellion, he traveled to France and Rome. However, his military reputation was damaged and he returned home to Scotland without any foreign support. Braveheart was made possible by the Manichaean approach to the conflict between English and Scottish people. The film’s directors made it possible for audiences to connect more with William Wallace by making England “the villains” and the Scottish “the good guys”. Particularly, Wallace’s death and failures are supposed to cause the audience pain and anger. Although this criticism is harsh, many reviewers feel that Braveheart promotes anti-Britainnism. Cited sources

Armstrong, P., McBride, A. (2012). Stirling Bridge, Falkirk 1297-98: William Wallace’s Rebellion. Bloomsbury Publishing, based in the United Kingdom, is the publisher.

Elvis Presley, an American musician, actor and singer, became famous in the 1950s, 1960s. Elvis Presley was known for being the King of Rock and Roll and was considered to be one of twenty-first century’s most significant cultural icons. Presley was believed to have died on the 16th, August 1977. Many people believe Elvis Presley passed away in 1977. A survey found that only 4 percent of respondents believed Presley was still alive and 93% believed he died. There are many theories to support the idea that Elvis Presley is still alive and hiding. There is also a lot of evidence. As his career declined, some believe Elvis just faked his suicide to get out of the spotlight. This critique will help you discover if Elvis died 42 or faked it.

It is claimed that Elvis Presley was alive and hiding after his death. While there are many reasons Elvis could be alive, the most common is the FBI enlisting him in 1976 to infiltrate criminal organizations. The FBI placed him under witness protective because he was later found to be a mole. Gail Brewer Giorgio, the author and bestselling author of Is Elvis Alive 1988, stated this. Interviews and documents can also prove Elvis’ involvement. She also claimed that Elvis faked death to avoid being killed, and she was quoted as saying this. However, Elvis is not mentioned in any of the 760 files that the FBI released. Patrick Lacey who researched Elvis Presley and wrote Elvis Decoded said that those FBI files are accessible to the general public …… There’s nothing in them. This shows that Elvis was not associated with the FBI as the evidence claims. There isn’t any documentation of Evils going underground for the FBI or mention of Elvis being in witness protective. Fans believe that Elvis faked death as the incorrect spelling of his name is evidence that he did not die. The name on his headstone, though, is Aaron. Elvis allegedly wanted to change his last name to Aron. Although he did wish to change his surname, his legal title is Aaron. Therefore the spelling of his actual name is correct on the headstone. Many alleged sightings, including Elvis himself, have occurred since his death. Fans noticed a man around 80 years of age on Elvis’ 82nd birthday. It is believed that he was traveling to Memphis to purchase a one-way ticket for Buenos Ares, Argentina. This was Elvis’ name for booking hotels. Elvis could have fled the country to escape. A few other sightings have occurred since his death. One of them is the photo of his pool house, in which a man who matches Elvis’ description was seen sitting in his poolhouse. In an interview, it was revealed that the man in the pool house wasn’t Elvis. However, others aren’t convinced. These theories that are based upon the fake death Elvis Presley cannot be tested. This makes it nearly impossible to prove them to be true. The evidence is built around assumptions. Although there is no evidence to support these assumptions, the number and frequency of sightings are the most reliable. However they can be biased and are not trustworthy. Elvis Presley’s death in 1977 is the only explanation. Evidence suggests that Elvis Presley, 42, died in Graceland’s Memphis mansion on August 16 1977. Ginger Alden, his girlfriend found him unconscious in a bathroom. They took him to Baptist Memorial Hospital. He died of heart failure, but it is now being believed that his death was caused by ongoing and severe drug abuse.

Elvis used opiates, sedatives and barbiturates over the years. It was also found in his blood through a toxicology report that high amounts of codeine and Percodan were present. Jerry Francisco, the medical examiner issued a statement saying that Presley died from drug-related causes. Elvis was given an inordinate amount of amphetamines. He was 40 years old by 1976 and was suffering from severe drug addiction. Elvis was also plagued by fatigue, fainting spells and high bloodpressure. Then you add type II diabetes, obesity, and an enlarged hearts, and you have a recipe for disaster. He was remembered by one of his guitarists as slurring his songs. His performances were often a disaster. He was given nearly 20 pills per day over the course of his 20-months and had three suitcases full of the drug with him on the road. Presley’s entourage received the drugs, which was why the drug count was so high. The other controversies surrounding his suicide are not as extreme as those that support his belief that he is still breathing. One is whether he died from a fall or a trip to the toilet. Another is whether drugs played any role in his death. The autopsy can verify this hypothesis and it is easy with only a few assumptions, making it trustworthy and reliable.

It is evident that the stronger hypothesis is more convincing when we examine both the claimant and alternate hypotheses. Because it can be confirmed through autopsies or toxicology reports, the alternative hypothesis that Elvis died in 1977 is stronger. It also has the smallest assumptions since all of the evidence can be supported. While there isn’t any solid evidence to support Elvis being alive, it is filled with assumptions and can’t be proven or tested. This makes it less credible and reliable. The assumption that Elvis lives is massive and difficult to prove. Presley’s only evidence supports Elvis death. When it comes to the criteria adequacy, however, the alternative hypothesis seems more likely and reasonable.

The Blind Side is my film of choice. This movie is a sociological concept that I found interesting. The Tuohy family decides to adopt Michael, a homeless teenager. Michael is from a broken family, his father is absent and his mother is a drug addict. The Tuohy’s children and their daughter both go to private schools. He is offered the opportunity to play football as well as to study at one of these schools. The Tuohy family finds out that Michael is having serious academic delays. They hire a tutor for Michael to help him study. He could get the support he needed to succeed in college and university.

The movie that depicts a dysfunctional family is the first sociological concept. Adopted relatives are also included in non-traditional family structures. The Tuohys portray a traditional family. Their father worked hard and their mother was a stay-at-home mom. When they accepted Michael into their home, they were deemed untraditional. Because the adopted child was not typical of her white, wealthy family, the mother always gets stares in the movie. Michael comes from a lower-income family, while his adoptive family is from an upper-income household. The movie shows the difference when Michal’s guardian must approach his biological mom to end her parental rights. Michael told his guardian to stay in the car when they entered the neighborhood. He knew that the neighborhood he grew-up in was dangerous. Michael was raised in a dysfunctional home by his drug-addicted mother. His father wasn’t exactly the picture that we saw in the class. This is sometimes the case, but it’s not always. Michael’s education was important because he was constantly being bounced between schools since he was in foster care. These different factors have an effect on one’s socioeconomic position in society. Another example is the time they purchased Michael a vehicle to help him pass his driver’s licence test. This was because her guardian economic status allowed him to purchase a vehicle for him, while he would still have to walk to school if she wasn’t there.

The interracial couple is the third sociological concept. Michael was an African American boy who could live in a white household. This is important as race plays a significant role in families. Without the family, Michael would most likely still be failing school. After he had lived with the family, he was capable of getting the necessary help with school assignments. He was able also to go to a private school and was awarded scholarships to top universities. If he had stayed in foster care, some of these opportunities wouldn’t have been possible to him. He received a great education and was capable of getting good grades. This allowed him to apply to different universities and choose the one that was right for him.

This movie provides a great insight into the concepts that we discussed in class about family and their place in society. These families come from different backgrounds and some are not traditional. These differences are what make us unique and can help us create the family we desire.

The Blind Side is directed and written by John Lee Hancock. It’s a must-see for mature viewers. This movie tells the tragic, heart-wrenching and moving story of Michael Oher, an NFL player. He was played by Quinton Aron. Sandra Bullock & Tim McGraw play Leigh Anne & Sean Tuohy. Jae head and Lily Collins play their two biological kids, Collins & S.J. Tuohy. The production was filmed at Atlanta, Georgia, in 2009. But the actual events were held in Memphis. The directors chose to film in an Atlanta house because it closely resembled their Memphis family home. It is a wonderful story that the directors have already had two children before they adopted another. This movie really brings it to life with the acting and acting of the actresses. This film is exceptionally well-acted, which is why it has been so successful. Warner Bros Production spent $29,000,000 to produce and create the film. The film earned $288,000,000 and made $317,000,000 worldwide. Without the extraordinary talent of the actors, and the portrayal on screen of deeply felt subjects, all this would have not been possible.

The film opens with the Tuohy family and ends with them adopting “Big Mike” (Michael Oher), as a member of their family. The Tuohy family is a wealthy, Southern, white, football-loving, and selfless group. It is not normal for someone of color to be a part of a white family in the modern society. Big Mike knew the Tuohys through S.J. and Collins. Briarcrest Christian School, where they were then attending, was also known to the Tuohy’s. They were aware that he was lonely and poor, and had not been raised in a home with stability. Leigh Anne was able to talk it through with Sean, and they agreed to let Big Mike live in their home. They also wanted him to be part of the family. The Tuohy’s were not happy with the outcome. Leigh Anne Touhy says that she knew people would have trouble with Michael (taking him in). We have a daughter exactly the same age. It’s okay to be selfish. You worry about yourself and I will worry about mine.” Big Mike can live with his parents, the Tuohys. It was a long process to get him through high school. Once he graduates, the only remaining decision is to go to college or play football in Fall. He makes a decision after much struggle and controversy. The Tuohy’s are proud of him and humbled by everything he has accomplished.

While the production was overall fantastic, it was a testament to the talent of the actors and their actresses. Expect greatness from Sandra Bullock or Tim McGraw, who play the main characters. Sandra Bullock is a mother who is intensely nurturing, selfless, and nurturing. Bullock had to be able fight for her rights and for her children’s best interests. Leigh Anne Tuohy was inspired by her determination and strong will. He is more at home performing live than in a movie, but he still amazes us. McGraw stated that he was initially nervous about the role of actor in the film’s final scene. McGraw portrays the patriarchal leader in a close-knit family. He is humble and a sports commentator as well as a restaurateur. He provides the primary income for his 5 children and is also the voice of reason in inviting Big Mike into their home. Sandra Bullock, Tim McGraw and their roles as a married couple make this movie even more successful.

This film also portrays racism in a positive light and shows how to handle it with respect. It is not difficult to see that interracial families are treated differently in a southern town than those of monoracial origin. Prejudice can exist in communities and it is quite sad that families still have to deal with this issue in the 21st Century. The Tuohy family shows how to respond to racism and ignorance. Leigh Anne is interrogated in the movie by her friends over allowing a large, dark boy to join their family. However, she has a girl exactly the same as him. Leigh Anne is proud and poised when she informs her friends that she doesn’t care about Michael’s race. After letting Michael know that he was not her child, she gets up and walks away. Leigh Anne then asks Collins what she thinks about living with him. Collins replies that she’s happy he’s safe. The film shows the strength and resilience of the family as they deal with racism. I was able to leave the theater feeling more open-minded and respectful of interracial families. The Blind Side teaches viewers to respect all people and treat them with kindness, love, and respect.

The Blind Side was not what viewers expected, even though they were nervous before the movie began. It touched people all over the world and encouraged them to be good citizens. They brought together the actors and responded to racism with such positivity and inspiration. The film will be watched for many years. While we don’t all have the ability to do the same as the Tuohys, this film shows how we can each make a significant impact on our world and those around us.

Mozart was not an ordinary man, both as an artist and musician. – Albert Einstein

Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart was the most famous and well-known classical composer and is considered the greatest and best known musician of all time. Mozart was born in Salzburg in 1756. At the time, Mozart wasn’t well-known for his music. The generation of romantics saw Mozart as a friend and gave him great success. It is possible to understand his legacy and why it has endured, if we look at his early life as a child-prodigy, musical mastery, and the endless praise he received from his fellow composers.

Wolfgang Mozart was an extraordinary child prodigy. He showed his incredible talent as a toddler. Mozart’s seven-year-old brother Marianne began taking clavier lessons from Leopold (a violinist in Salzburg Archbishops) when he was three years old. Mozart used to spend hours sitting at the keyboard. Mozart was a child who enjoyed the sound of the keyboard. However, his father noticed something more. Mozart was able to sense tension and harmony. Leopold recognized his son’s musical talents and began nurturing them. Mozart began lessons in clavier from his father at four years old. He learned many minuets quickly and took only half an hour each to master them. Mozart began writing his own little pieces at five years old. Leopold noted in the margins the music that “little Wolfgang” was composed within the first three-months after his fifth birth. These notes are what were first to indicate that young Wolfgang was a composer. Mozart was just seven years of age when he composed six sonatas on piano and violin. Mozart’s musical genius is demonstrated by his ability to compose and play these pieces as young children.

Leopold took Mozart to Europe and Britain in 1762 to show off his talents. He displayed incredible talents, including the ability to sight-read Bach pieces and to improvise beautiful melodies on the figured bass of a Handel song. It was a great success and Mozart received acclaim. Mozart was named “Master Mozart, Seven-year-old, prodigy in nature” in London. Leopold proudly wrote his friend, “Everyone is amazed, particularly at the boy” during his trip. Leopold continued to show his son his musical talents until 1773, when Mozart became independent from his father. Leopold’s influence on Mozart deserves to be acknowledged. Mozart was not influenced by any other musical teacher than his father. Leopold saw the potential in his son and encouraged him to develop his talent. He made Mozart’s genius famous throughout Europe. Wolfgang wouldn’t have been able to achieve the greatness and character he achieved without his father’s help.

Mozart was a master of music. He was a great clavier musician, he was “one of greatest clavier viosi of our time”. He was proficient on the violin, but his primary focus was on the keyboard. Niemetschek, who was an early biographer of Mozart’s, praised the composer’s piano skills when he wrote “His admirable dexterity…his feeling and delicacy, and beautiful expression…together with his abundant ideas and his knowledge of composition must have enthralled every listener and made Mozart the greatest pianist of all time” . MuzioClementi, a fellow composer, applauded Mozart when he stated to his pupil that Mozart had “untold” the pianist’s ability to play with such elegance and spirit after seeing Mozart perform.

Mozart was a master of improvisation. He didn’t have to make piano sonatas and variations. Instead, he was free to improvise. He only made his compositions available to pupils who were trying to learn them or to publishers. Maximilian Stadler (a friend of Mozart) wrote that Mozart’s improvisational talents were well-ordered in his autobiography. Many people believed that Mozart had practiced improvisations before he performed them in public. These accounts are clear proof that Mozart was skilled at improvisation.

Mozart was an extraordinary composer. He composed in a way that was so natural. He didn’t have any need to research for ideas. His compositions were just there. He was so comfortable creating music that he could work on multiple pieces at once. Mozart was also able to compose music at an incredible speed. He composed a sonata on pianoforte for violin one night before he was due to perform it in concert. The sonata was not written down or practiced with his partner. He played it from memory the next morning. His compositions contain many examples of his extraordinary ability to create contrapuntal combinations, movement structures, use of counterpoint and harmonic modulations. Wolfgang Mozart’s extraordinary composition, keyboard, and improvisational skills prove that he was an exemplary musician.

Mozart produced a staggering number of works during his brief life. The complete catalogue is exhausting. There are twenty operas. Mozart wrote to his father, in 1778, saying that he “can more or less mimic any type and every style of composition.” His work is an example of this self-deprecating ability.

Mozart was the greatest classical style master. The classical style was distinguished by a lighter touch than earlier Baroque works. This was possible because Mozart’s melodies were so unique and distinguished him from other composers at the time. Richard Strauss, a great melodyt, said that Mozart had the most perfect melodic shapes. He also has the lightness and purpose of his music. His “light” melodies were a result his excellent technique. These delicate melodies made Mozart’s music accessible to a wider audience. Every German schoolchild can still sing ‘Komm! liber Mai’ today. The classical style has a broad range of moods and dynamics. Mozart’s classical style would allow him to express many emotions and have strong contrasts of styles and feelings in a single piece. Mozart is the greatest classical composer in history, with his mastery for the classical style unsurpassed by any other composer.

Mozart is often praised by fellow composers. Joseph Haydn was at that time the most well-known European composer. He was stunned to see young Mozart live. Leopold Mozart was astonished when he commented to him that his son was the greatest composer he knew either by name or in person. He is a taster and has the best knowledge of composition. Haydn’s judgement was the greatest recognition Mozart could have received during that time. He expressed his admiration for Mozart at later times.

Even though Haydn’s approval was an exceptional achievement by Mozart, it was just one of the few instances of praise he received. Lorenzo Da Ponte was the author of the librettos for three Mozart operas. Da Ponte suggested Mozart had been stopped by his enemies and not a lack in talent. Mozart didn’t get the recognition he deserved, whatever the reason. Pyotr Ilitch Tchaikovsky, a romantic composer, worshipped Mozart openly throughout his entire life. Tchaikovsky made two memorials to Mozart, his “Mozartiana” Suite (op. 61) or a vocal group. Mozart was also revered by Romantic poets like Ludwig Tieck and Wilhelm Heinrich Wackenroder. Mozart received so much praise for his work that it is hard to believe.

Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart was thirty-five years old when he died December 5, 1791. He lived a short but productive life. His compositions lasted for nearly 29 years. His early writing began at an early age. This allowed him to have almost the same ‘composing lifetime’ as other composers. Mozart’s music and influence have remained unaffected by his childhood as a child prodigy. He was a musical master, a great composer, and he has many works. Mozart is the most well-known and most widely recognized classical composer, as well as the greatest musical genius.

Christopher Nolan vividly recreated Dunkirk’s events, which saw the British and allies fleeing France’s Northern shores. It was set in 1940 during World War Two. Nolan is best known for his films Inception (2010), The Dark Knight Trilogy (2008), and 2012, but Dunkirk (2017) also showcases Nolan’s distinctive style. Nolan managed to keep the film very silent with only a few words. Nolan’s musically precise timings, and beats (Nolan 2018), help to create the feeling of surprise. This story is set directly on the blood-stained beaches of France and the English Channel. The narrative depicts the bravery and fear of soldiers fighting in an era of constant instability. The Dunkirk survival story, told in cinematic style and with overlapping storieslines, was unique. It was an incredibly frightening time in history, as the end of the Great Depression brought about a new global war on a scale never seen before. The new generation was unaware of the technological advances and increased enemy numbers that were made possible by World War One. The unpredictable tides created chaos and instabilities, as was demonstrated in Dunkirk. Nolan’s use camera motion creates an atmosphere that places the audience in every shot. Tracking shots that allow humans to move, such as those used to follow Commander Bolton around the mole, give the illusion of realism. The Destroyer’s interior, which was jammed with soldiers, was filmed from other perspectives. “The camera work was entirely handheld. The camera moves through crowds shifting, diving, ducking and shifting as it goes.” It provided an audience with a view through the eyes that of another insider. The constant action from planes dropping from the sky to ships being torpedoed to ships being torpedoed was able bring the chaos closer home and symbolize the fragility that war. Nolan creates tension throughout the film without relying on plot. Instead, the storylines flow into each other. It all comes down the expectation of what’s coming. Nolan does this a lot, especially when Nolan notices that a ‘Heinkel’ is approaching, and she lines up to dump her load on a minesweeper. Christopher Nolan’s innovative camera techniques allowed him to show the instabilities of war. Nolan managed to keep the room on their feet with the horrific acts of enemy fire. One scene in the film that follows pilot Farrier is loud and heavy. It has a non-diegetic, non-diegetic beat. As the film ends, you will be watching with anticipation as Farrier lands on the beach. The long scene gave you a deeper understanding of the fear involved in war and the sacrifices that were made. The audience can see the brutal fear in Dunkirk through the close-ups of their faces and expressions. Dunkirk was unique in that it did not focus heavily on any of the protagonists but rather the moments they were being in. This allowed for a more profound understanding of the loss of soldiers at war. Because of his deliberate limitation on characterisation, Dunkirk’s evacuation could be seen through many eyes. Nolan believed that backstory or a character-based plot would make it impossible to know the facts about Dunkirk. Nolan’s unique methods brought fear and the strong emotion it evoked to the audience while they were watching Dunkirk. In the absence of combat, there is no other example of true heroism than soldiers who fight for their country and their fellow citizens. Nolan demonstrated bravery and the difficulty of portraying the Dunkirk events. Nolan’s portrayal of civilians who helped evacuate British soldiers was a refreshing view on bravery. There was a crisis with a rapidly approaching Nazi army, ‘four hundred million men stranded along the beach’ and needed to be resolved. But, it would be difficult for this historical event to be resolved as ‘Churchil [only] had plans for] thirty thousand’ men to make their way home. Although the evacuation was not in accordance with the plan, it was possible to do something for the stranded. This was done by the civilian army. Dawson was in a position to be able to use the camera angle that captured oil-slick soldiers. His heroic acts of sacrifice, including his journey to Dunkirk following the British Navy’s request for civilian boats, were a heroism for his country. Nolan used characters and not character building to show bravery. There were no character arcs. Instead, the heroic acts displayed by the men or women through visuals. The heroes of the men and women were shown through visuals and acts of appreciation, with no character arcs. This was the greatest loss of human life, with more than 60 million people dying between 1939 and 1945. The constant fear of the ‘enemy coming through’ and the changing pace, Nolan represented both victory and defeat. It relied heavily on mise en scene to show the enormous ‘power, might,’ at the front of World War II. Nolan used neutral colours such as army greens, navy blues, and sand tans to show the destitute conditions and invite the audience to become part of his creation. The uniforms, warships and aircraft, as well as the weaponry, revealed the story and location. Conversations also assisted in this process. Nolan relied almost exclusively on sound and visuals to convey the war genre, as well as a crisis or resolution. The film was influenced by music, which played a major role. The effect is achieved through overlaying sound that is one octave lower than the previous. This trick tricks the brain into thinking there is an ascending tone. Hans Zimmer’s score…with a sound that tickled, made the ever-present incoming artillery from the West more powerful and compelling. The sound used to’make you cling your seat’ was used to depict the enemy approaching, always anticipating the danger. These methods combined made Dunkirk an emotive, strong war film that gave a better understanding of the real Dunkirk. Christoper Nolan recreated the dramatic Dunkirk events and successfully demonstrated their power. Nolan’s new Take on Structure based On the Shepard Tone’ was able capturing and creating a unique film about war. With his realistic cinematography as well as non-traditional storytelling, Nolan captured the fear of insurgent soldiers and their bravery.

Donnie Darko, Richard Kelly’s 2001 drama/fantasy movie, is grounded in realism. The story revolves around Donnie, an American suburban middlesex resident. Donnie is awakened by a demon rabbit who tells him to stop sleeping during 1988’s Presidential Elections. The director uses mise in scene and cinematography throughout the movie to draw viewers to Donnie. Donnie Darko’s film reveals both character and atmosphere through sound editing. Through the connecting of scenes and shots, the director draws the audience into his world.

The film’s first half offers a stunning example of the film’s themes and motifs. These scenes are about the contrast between Donnie, protagonist, and Frank (antagonist). The scenes are juxtaposed, which emphasizes a parallel. Both scenes create an atmosphere of panic and creepiness, which in turn complement one another to make a show of struggling to shake it off. Frank urges Donnie, in the second scene, to get up. The voice is ominous and haunting. Donnie can only hear Frank’s voice, but this is subjective. Donnie sleepwalks from his bedroom to follow Frank’s voice. The music used in the background creates tension, making it both frightening and dull. Frank appears as a demon-looking rabbit-sized figure to the audience when he first meets him. His role as “manipulated dead” is for Donnie to help him correct the chronology by returning the jet engine back to its original universe. Frank is honest and wants to help Donnie, but he tells Donnie to do wrong so he can save the universe. Donnie is forced to arson Jim Cunningham’s house during Donnie’s sister’s performance in his school talent show. The camera uses the fade technique to transition between Donnie’s and Frank’s characters. This camera prefigures Donnie will be close to Frank, making it seem like Frank is part of Donnie’s soul. The supernatural motif and theme continue, and the audience believes in the demonic rabbit-being’s inhumanities. Donnie and Frank depict Donnie’s mental instability. Donnie has schizophrenic tendencies and is on medication. Frank is a metaphor that reflects Donnie’s eccentricity. Donnie smiles at Frank when he tells him when it will end. Frank is sleepingwalking, but Donnie’s reaction to the news that the world would end is genuine and unusual.

After Donnie’s interaction with Frank, Donnie’s plane crashes into Frank’s room. Donnie was shaken and scarred by the incident. The way the incident is presented makes it seem like the worst has happened. This scene is filmed in slow motion to emphasize the horror and destruction caused by the plane engine. Donnie’s father runs to see if his family has been safe. It seems like time is slowing down because the unimaginable could have occurred. Donnie hears exactly the same sound from the movie’s opening scene. This tells us that the events are not ordered. It is a sign of time travel. Frank is not just a fiction, but a real person. Donnie is now able to trust Frank, even though he looks terrifyingly evil in his rabbit suit and unsettling introduction. Donnie’s sister’s deep breathing and camera work that fades out might be symbolic of death. The chaos that surrounds the Darko family home is what the audience hears the most. The darkness ends after chaos passes, and the film’s ending is marked by death.

People take life for granted the mind they have. They forget how unique each person is. Donnie is described as being extremely intelligent and paranoid schizophrenia. This disorder involves having perplexing thoughts and emotions and a different way of seeing the world. Donnie can see Frank, and he also sees the wormholes in the sky. Donnie claims to be able to see the paths of others. After a party he and he’s sister put on, Donnie started to see transparent lines that traced peoples’ movements through time. He thought it was time travel. Donnie is only aggressive when Frank manipulates him to commit crimes. For example, Donnie set fire to Jim Cunningham’s house and then showed the audience his dislike for Cunningham and his philosophy on the meaning and values of life. Frank also ordered Donnie to vandalize the school by bursting a waterpipe, which causes it to flood. Donnie also spray painted the “They made us do it” sign around the school statue. It is called a detachment, dissociation or a triumph of the subconscious over the conscious when someone’s reality is not being reflected in their thoughts.

These scenes were selected to show how they relate and are parallel. These scenes are related because they create a feeling of unease in the minds of the audience. These scenes work together in a way that is so compelling that audience members can’t stop looking at the screen. Frank’s manipulations of Donnie, such as vandalism or arson, are beyond Donnie’s control. The movie is about time and time travel. Donnie Darko’s film also features themes about coming-of-age. Each human being experiences pubescence and love.